What would Mohammed Drive?
The Doug Marlette’s cartoon, depicting an Arab, driving nuclear weapons in a rental car, caused many controversies, and enraged the members of Islamic community in the USA. Controversial cartoon, according to the words of the author, was an allusion to the issue that arose among some Protestants over the morality of driving gas-guzzling SUV: “What would Jesus drive?”
Whatever was the motive for Marlette to draw this cartoon, its purpose was, undoubtedly, to provoke many, the Islamic community, as well as the Americans. Some aspects of this cartoon, both those visible, and the ones drawn from the context, serve to “jab and poke” Marlette’s target audience, the Islamic community in the States.
Of great significance certainly is the date when the cartoon was made, and appeared subsequently on the official site of the American newspapers. The cartoon appeared on-line immediatelly after 11th September 2001, when the infamous terrorist attack occurred, and the planes crushed into the World Trade Center. The whole nation was still recovering, and the wounds were still fresh, so the cartoon additionally enraged and infuriated already frightened Islamic community that was labeled as terroristic after the attack.
Additionally to that, some details, like the portrait of the driver, only further enhanced the provocative effect. The driver appears to be angry, revengeful, the look of his face suggests that he is willing to accomplish his goal, and that he enjoys in it. Some may interpret him as a personification of Mohammed himself, but according to Marlette’s words, it is not Mohammed, but “generic Arab headless-wearing man”.
Another striking thing about the cartoon is the vehicle that the Arab is driving. The truck is a Ryder rental truck, the one that was used for the previously thwarted, terrorist attack. Analogy is very obvious here, suggesting the readers that the threat does not come from the air only, but that it can come from anywhere. In this way, the cartoon, deliberately, or not, spreads the fear and panic among already frightened non-Arabic Americans.
It is needless to say that the controversial drawing is more than persuasive. Due to its composition, analogy and symbolic, it leaves no one indifferent. The author’s goal was, undoubtely, to shock, and provoke a strong emotional reaction among the readership, which consists of both Islamic and non-Islamic people. The controversis and reactions that this cartoon provokes even today, proves that Marlette achieved his goal.